This is not something that is concluded from facts or other: “It is not a conscious speaking subject. Therefore that presentation is a lie.” That is ridiculous.
Fair enough.
I’ve been repeatedly reformulating your position, and you’ve repeatedly told me that’s not your position.
So, I shouldn’t keep constructing arguments and attributing them to you.
What I can say is:
– You have rejected my attempts to frame the disagreement as being about definitions of lying.
– You have rejected my attempts to turn your point into a syllogism.
– You have rejected my attempts to reduce it to consciousness, intent, or epistemology.
So yes, at this point it would be ridiculous for me to continue pretending I’ve captured your argument when you’ve explicitly said I haven’t.
I don’t think I’ve actually identified the point you’re saying you’ve already demonstrated.